In the eyes of a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning highlight of the baseball championship didn't happen during the tense final game on Saturday, when her squad executed multiple dramatic comeback feat after another and then winning in overtime over the opposing team.
It happened a game earlier, when two second-tier athletes, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a thrilling, game-winning sequence that simultaneously upended numerous negative misconceptions promoted about Hispanic people in the past decades.
The moment in itself was breathtaking: the outfielder charged in from left field to snag a ball he initially lost in the stadium lights, then fired it to the infield to secure another, decisive play. the second baseman, positioned nearby, received the ball moments before a runner collided with him, sending him to the ground.
This was not just a remarkable athletic moment, possibly the key shift in the series in the Dodgers' favor after appearing for much of the series like the weaker side. To her, it was thrilling, politically and culturally, a much-required uplift for the community and for the city after a period of immigration raids, troops patrolling the neighborhoods, and a steady drumbeat of criticism from national leaders.
"The players put forth this alternative story," explained Molina. "Everyone saw Latinos displaying an infectious pride and joy in what they do, being key figures on the team, exhibiting a different kind of masculinity. They are energetic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."
"This represented such a juxtaposition with what we see on the news – raids, Latinos detained and chased down. It is so easy to be disheartened these days."
Not that it's exactly straightforward to be a team fan these days – for Molina or for the legions of other fans who attend faithfully to home games and fill up as many as 50% of the stadium's fifty thousand spots each time.
When intensified immigration raids began in Los Angeles in early June, and military units were deployed into the area to respond to ensuing protests, two of the city's sports teams quickly issued statements of support with immigrant families – but not the baseball team.
Management stated the organization prefer to steer clear of political issues – a stance influenced, perhaps, by the fact that a sizable minority of the supporters, including Latinos, are supporters of certain political figures. After considerable external demands, the organization later committed $1m in aid for families directly impacted by the operations but made no official criticism of the administration.
Months before, the organization did not delay in agreeing to an offer to mark their 2024 World Series win at the official residence – a decision that sports writers labeled as "disappointing … spineless … and contradictory", given the Dodgers' pride in having been the pioneering professional franchise to end the racial segregation in the 1940s and the regular invocations of that legacy and the values it embodies by officials and current and past athletes. A number of players such as the coach had expressed reluctance to travel to the White House during the first term but either reconsidered or gave in to pressure from team management.
An additional complication for supporters is that the team are controlled by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose equity holdings, according to media reports and its own published financial documents, involve a share in a detention company that runs enforcement facilities. The group's executives has stated repeatedly that it wants to remain neutral of politics, but its detractors say the silence – and the financial stake – are their own type of compliance to certain policies.
These factors add up to significant mixed feelings among Latino supporters in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the excitement of this year's hard-fought World Series victory and the following explosion of team pride across the city.
"Can one to support the team?" local writer Erick Galindo agonized at the start of the postseason in an thoughtful article pondering on "team loyalty in our veins, but doubt in our minds". He was unable to ultimately bring himself to watch the championship, but he still cared strongly, to the extent that he believed his personal boycott must have brought the squad the luck it needed to succeed.
Numerous supporters who share Galindo's misgivings appear to have concluded that they can continue to back the players and its roster of international players, featuring the Asian superstar a key player, while expressing disdain on the organization's business leadership. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at the home venue on Monday, when the packed audience cheered in support of the manager and his athletes but booed the team president and the chief executive of the investors.
"The executives in formal attire do not get to claim our boys in blue from us," the fan said. "We've been with the Dodgers longer than they have."
The issue, however, runs deeper than only the organization's current proprietors. The agreement that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the late 1950s required the municipality demolishing three low-income Latino communities on a hill above the city center and then selling the land to the organization for a small part of its market value. A song on a 2005 album that chronicles the story has an low-income worker at the stadium revealing that the house he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.
Gustavo Arellano, perhaps the region's most influential Mexican American writer and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, dysfunctional dynamic between the team and its audience. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an undue, even unhealthy devotion by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for decades.
"They've acted around Hispanic followers while picking their pockets with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to get away with it," Arellano wrote over the warmer months, when calls to avoid the organization over its lack of response to the raids were contradicted by the awkward reality that attendance at matches did not dip, even at the height of the demonstrations when downtown LA was subject to a nightly restriction.
Separating the team from its business leadership is not a simple task, {