The latest departures of the BBC's director general and its news chief over claims of bias have been portrayed as an internal "takeover" by a ex media executive.
David Yelland, who previously ran the Sun publication from 1998 to 2003, claimed during a broadcast that the departures of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness followed systematic undermining by people associated with the BBC board over an extended period.
"It constituted a takeover, and worse than that, it represented an inside job. There were people inside the corporation, extremely connected to the leadership ... serving on the board, who have systematically weakened Tim Davie and his senior team over a period of [time] and this has been continuing for a long time. What transpired recently didn't just happen in isolation," Yelland commented.
"What has occurred here is there existed a failure of governance. I don't blame the leader [Samir Shah] as an person, but the responsibility of the leader of any institution, a corporation – including the BBC – is to maintain their chief executive, their top executive, in role or dismiss them. And that has failed to happen, because Tim Davie was not dismissed. He stepped down and so there existed, that is the definition of, a failure of leadership."
The resignations on Sunday followed days of criticism from the U.S. administration and rightwing commentators in the UK that were prompted by allegations published by the Daily Telegraph.
The publication reported a unauthorized account of the conclusions of a former independent external adviser to its content standards panel, Michael Prescott, who left his role during the summer.
He had criticized the editing of a address by Donald Trump in an episode of Panorama, which he claimed made it seem that Trump had encouraged the US Capitol attack. Two portions of the address that were combined together were delivered an hour apart, and the modification did not note that Trump had additionally said he wanted his followers to protest non-violently.
Yelland's criticisms mirror a mood of concern described by insiders within BBC News on Sunday evening, with one saying: "It seems like a coup. This is the outcome of a effort by partisan enemies of the BBC."
Others, encompassing Sky's previous political editor Adam Boulton, have stated the general impression that Trump encouraged the event was fundamentally true. It is common procedure to edit together segments of a long address to properly condense it.
Davie indicated his exit would not be immediate and that he was "managing" scheduling to ensure an "orderly transition" over the coming period. Turness commented controversy around the Panorama edit had "arrived at a stage where it is creating harm to the BBC – an institution that I love."
On Monday, the BBC journalist Nick Robinson stated there had been inaction at the highest levels of the BBC because, while its experienced reporters desired to apologize for the production mistake – but insist there was "no plan to deceive" the viewers – the politically appointed directors wanted to take additional steps.
Shah is expected to express regret on Monday to the Parliament's culture, media and sport committee, and to supply further details on the Panorama program in his response to the panel, which had requested how he would handle the concerns.
Speaking after the departures, the government minister Louise Sandher-Jones rejected suggestions the BBC was systematically biased. The public service official stated Sky News: "When you look at the huge range of national matters, regional issues, international issues, that it has to cover, I think its output is very trusted. When I converse with people who've got firmly established views on those, they're continuing utilizing the BBC for much of their information, it's shaping their views on this."